spitfire
08-16-2007, 10:27 PM
#27
Not the best
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US of A, deep south (GA)
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by Biplane Murphy
Looks neat, but if it was me....I'd buy a modern airplane computer radio with the appropriate airplane mixes....
it has appropriate airplane mixes...
...and i can't fly two stick very well
08-17-2007, 12:18 AM
#33
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 440
Originally Posted by Biplane Murphy
Two sticks provide more flexibility for later!!!
Lip84
08-17-2007, 12:50 AM
#34
Not the best
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US of A, deep south (GA)
Posts: 660
OK two things,
one, let me tell you how to hold a signal stick, you rap your left hand around the transmitter and your ring finger works the throttle, and your right hand is on the stick and you twist it for aileron and turn it for rudder and push it forward and back for elevator!
two, lets try to keep it on topic, i don't want the moderator to lock this topic:<
one, let me tell you how to hold a signal stick, you rap your left hand around the transmitter and your ring finger works the throttle, and your right hand is on the stick and you twist it for aileron and turn it for rudder and push it forward and back for elevator!
two, lets try to keep it on topic, i don't want the moderator to lock this topic:<
08-17-2007, 12:57 AM
#35
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 106
Perhaps a DX7, rather than 72 mhz
Just my opinion. if you plan to spend $340 on a transmitter get a DX7, so you won't have as many glitches/channel problems. If I didn't have 2 nice computer TX's on 72 mhz and a Spectra module i'd be flying 2.4 ghz for sure.
08-17-2007, 01:26 AM
#37
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 106
Really "JR Century 7 Transmitter Receiver NER-527X 7 channel on 72.750" seems to me it is a 72 mhz Channel 24 transmitter. I sill suggest the DX7, if you plan to fly more than one plane on the transmitter(and getting another $340 per plane gets expensive. Fast.) a computer transmitter is worth the price just for the digital trims.
08-17-2007, 02:07 AM
#40
2 Wings, Twice The Fun
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern California High Desert
Posts: 4,534
Originally Posted by spitfire
now lets try to keep it on topic!!!
i don't want the moderators to lock it
i don't want the moderators to lock it
thanks
?
08-17-2007, 02:58 AM
#46
2 Wings, Twice The Fun
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern California High Desert
Posts: 4,534
30"......cool...should be a nice parkflyer size.....
Well you really like those "oldschool" transmitters don't you?
If that's what you like Go for it!!
Just make sure you can get compatible recievers for it.
Well you really like those "oldschool" transmitters don't you?
If that's what you like Go for it!!
Just make sure you can get compatible recievers for it.
08-17-2007, 03:08 AM
#47
Not the best
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: US of A, deep south (GA)
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by Biplane Murphy
30"......cool...should be a nice parkflyer size.....
Well you really like those "oldschool" transmitters don't you?
If that's what you like Go for it!!
Just make sure you can get compatible recievers for it.
Well you really like those "oldschool" transmitters don't you?
If that's what you like Go for it!!
Just make sure you can get compatible recievers for it.
yep i just really like signal sticks and sense this one is FM i will be able to buy receivers for it!
and yes it should make a good parkflyer do to its small wing span
08-17-2007, 05:15 PM
#50
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 106
Looks real nice, flaps are probably unecessary for performance based reasons, but the cool factor can't be denied. And you have already shown with your radio interests that you are hard to dissuade so: Good Luck, and turn this into a build log, I'm interested.
