Question - AZ Hobby Aztech Lipos? 3x lighter then normal??? - WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight

Batteries & Chargers Discuss Li-P, Li-Ion, NiMh, Nicad battery technology and the chargers that juice 'em up!

Question - AZ Hobby Aztech Lipos? 3x lighter then normal???

Old 09-09-2008, 04:28 PM
  #1  
gpang788
New Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10
Default Question - AZ Hobby Aztech Lipos? 3x lighter then normal???

HI all, just wondering has anybody tried these batteries?

http://www.aztech.com/rc/acc_batt.html

The 20c 11.1v 2100mah 3s1p @ 58.5grams seems ridiculously light?? Most batteries of this size would weigh in at about 150-160grams. Thats 3 times lighter then other batteries!!

Has anybody used these batteries before? Are they any good?

Any comments?

Thanks
gpang788 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:05 PM
  #2  
prop-er
Launchpad McQuack
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Moordrecht, Netherlands
Posts: 2
Default

It's the weight per cell.

You can see for yourself the weight of the 3S and identical capacity 4S version are the same...
prop-er is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E-Fuel Hobbies
Batteries & Chargers
2
06-20-2008 12:06 PM
Ivan M
Standard & Large E-Heli Talk
12
04-01-2008 05:45 AM
Avalerion
General RC items For Sale and WTB
4
01-20-2008 05:22 PM
Ivan M
Micro Sized Electric Helicopters
3
11-29-2007 02:45 AM
UncleBob
General Electric Discussions
2
10-03-2007 02:07 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: Question - AZ Hobby Aztech Lipos? 3x lighter then normal???


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.07189 seconds with 13 queries