Survey from Revolectrix
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12

Help us by completing a brief survey and become eligible for prizes from Revolectrix!
http://www.revolectrix.com/new_appli...t01.20.17.html
Thanks,
Jamie Marks
REVO USA
http://www.revolectrix.com/new_appli...t01.20.17.html
Thanks,
Jamie Marks
REVO USA
#2

I would have liked to see an option for "heard of BUMP system but not interested". People have begun performing quite a bit of parallel charging and my understanding is that the BUMP system does not accommodate this. Your quad system sound nice but I feel it could use a bit more wattage now that larger power systems have come down in prices. We still actively promote the PowerLab line of chargers to all newcomers at the field.
#3

I have a Powerlab 6 and absolutely love it. Buying it and a parallel charge board was one of the best RC decisions I have made. Also, I do know some high power Heli guys that are always looking for a more powerful charging setup. They already are using your dual PL8. But that is not me.
For me, even the powerlab 6 is overkill. I am a fixed wing guy and the largest batteries I currently use are 4S-4000. I probably max out at around 300 watts of charging power. (4 4S 4000s in parallel charging at 1C) Also, right now I find myself using my parkflyer sized planes the most. These are in the 1500-2600 3S battery size.
So... If I'd be in the market for a new charger, I guess I'd be looking for a full feature 4S 500 Watt minimum system. I am willing to spend some more for a more accurate, higher quality, and safer charger. Parallel charging for me is easier than multiple charges. I am not sold on needing the bump system. It's easy enough for me to set the charge rate myself.
My only quibble with my PL-6 is the display. I'd prefer a larger screen with more status information on each screen. But it's really a rather minor concern.
This is just my thoughts and where I am today...
Steve
For me, even the powerlab 6 is overkill. I am a fixed wing guy and the largest batteries I currently use are 4S-4000. I probably max out at around 300 watts of charging power. (4 4S 4000s in parallel charging at 1C) Also, right now I find myself using my parkflyer sized planes the most. These are in the 1500-2600 3S battery size.
So... If I'd be in the market for a new charger, I guess I'd be looking for a full feature 4S 500 Watt minimum system. I am willing to spend some more for a more accurate, higher quality, and safer charger. Parallel charging for me is easier than multiple charges. I am not sold on needing the bump system. It's easy enough for me to set the charge rate myself.
My only quibble with my PL-6 is the display. I'd prefer a larger screen with more status information on each screen. But it's really a rather minor concern.
This is just my thoughts and where I am today...
Steve
#4
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 12

I would have liked to see an option for "heard of BUMP system but not interested". People have begun performing quite a bit of parallel charging and my understanding is that the BUMP system does not accommodate this. Your quad system sound nice but I feel it could use a bit more wattage now that larger power systems have come down in prices. We still actively promote the PowerLab line of chargers to all newcomers at the field.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Murocflyer
General Electric Discussions
55
05-07-2014 01:24 AM
rcchick
General Electric Discussions
28
04-02-2014 07:15 AM
Howard Matos
FMA Direct
1
11-25-2013 10:22 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)