Comparison Chart anywhere? - WattFlyer RC Electric Flight Forums - Discuss radio control eflight

Power Systems Talk about motors, ESC speed controllers, gear drives, propellers, power system simulators and all power system related topics

Comparison Chart anywhere?

Old 07-20-2005, 12:25 AM
  #1  
Reformed Nitroaddict
Member
Thread Starter
 
Reformed Nitroaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 443
Default Comparison Chart anywhere?

Okay - so the industry standard, or lack therof, for brushless power comparisons baffles me. I am running Himax motors in my planes, but would love to see a comparison to other brands before I buy my next motor to go in my upcoming Stevens Aero plane.

Is there anywhere on the web that gives a comparison of amps/watts/voltage ect... of various BL motors?
Reformed Nitroaddict is offline  
Old 07-20-2005, 02:38 AM
  #2  
Mike Parsons
Penguins still can't fly
 
Mike Parsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 5,136
Default

There is a website that has quite a bit of motor comparisons. I will see if I can find it. Great information. Think it was called the Great motor test or something like that.

-Mike
Mike Parsons is offline  
Old 07-20-2005, 02:21 PM
  #3  
Reformed Nitroaddict
Member
Thread Starter
 
Reformed Nitroaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 443
Default

Please - that would be very helpful in deciding on new motor purchases.
Reformed Nitroaddict is offline  
Old 07-20-2005, 07:54 PM
  #4  
Mike Parsons
Penguins still can't fly
 
Mike Parsons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, Ga
Posts: 5,136
Default

Here you go
http://www.flyingmodels.org/motortest/index_e.htm
Mike Parsons is offline  
Old 07-25-2005, 11:05 PM
  #5  
adam_one
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
Default Estimate Motor & Prop Combo

You might also wish to check out the following site:
https://rcplanes.online/calc_motor.htm

Last edited by adam_one; 12-23-2017 at 06:43 PM. Reason: Changed URL
adam_one is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 02:09 AM
  #6  
Jason T
Electron Liberator
 
Jason T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,103
Default

adam_one,

Welcome to Wattflyers!
Jason T is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:02 AM
  #7  
adam_one
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
Default

Originally Posted by Jason T
adam_one,

Welcome to Wattflyers!
Thanks!
adam_one is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 05:53 PM
  #8  
Matt Kirsch
Super Contributor
 
Matt Kirsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,086
Default

It's not that the motor manufacturers are evil and withholding information to gain power over the masses... They would absolutely JUMP at a simple metric by which they could claim that their motor is better at all the rest.

The unfortunate truth is, there's no simple way to compare two motors unless they're nearly identical. That is, similar rotor length, similar rotor diameter, same design (inrunner/outrunner), similar mass.

There's only one way to make it easy: All manufacturers would have to agree on a set of specific motor designs. Basically, they'd all be making the exact same motors. The problem with this is that for all intents and purposes, the motors would all perform identically. You'd see minor differences in RPM and efficiency due to the quality of materials and manufacturing, but only minor.

When you compare glow engnies, you're comparing a complete power system. A motor is just one piece of an electric power system, the equivalent of the crankshaft in a glow engine.

To say that the information at flyingmodels.org is a motor comparison is a misnomer. It's a POWER SYSTEM comparison. Just by looking at the charts and comparing them, you can easily see that there is lots of "crossover" where two different motors will basically be doing the exact same thing. So, which one is better in that case from a "performance comparison" perspective? They're both offering the same performance...

Do not get me wrong. Sites like that are TREMENDOUSLY useful. The charts show you what combinations work, and how they perform. This is scads better than blind trial and error, especially when the motor manufacturer doesn't provide its own application charts. If I know what the plane needs as far as Watts and prop diameter, I can jump on a site like that and easily find at least one combination that will do the job.

Last edited by Matt Kirsch; 07-26-2005 at 08:30 PM.
Matt Kirsch is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 06:05 PM
  #9  
Reformed Nitroaddict
Member
Thread Starter
 
Reformed Nitroaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 443
Default

Matt - Basically what I was looking for was a way to compare motors and have it shown that at peak operating performance each motor would produce how many watts of power and how much thrust on an identical prop.

For example - I know that my Himax 2808-860 outrunner can turn a 9x6 prop at full throttle on 11V and it produces 8.5amps. This is listed in a chart on their website. So, in the most simplest sense, this motor will produce roughly 93.5watts of power. Now, if I were to want a motor that produced slightly more watts, say 120-145watts on 11V because of a slightly heavier model - how would I find out which motors are my best choices other than simply asking around?
Reformed Nitroaddict is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 06:39 PM
  #10  
Matt Kirsch
Super Contributor
 
Matt Kirsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,086
Default

You've got all the information you need right there: 120-145 Watts on 11V (a 3S LiPoly). From the Watts=Volts*Amps equation you can figure out that to get 145 Watts on 11V, you need a motor that can handle around 13 Amps.

All motors are rated by maximum cell count and maximum current, so it's relatively easy to find motors that can handle this kind of power. The hard part is coming up with a gearbox/prop combination that gets the power to the prop, and this is where flyingmodels comes in extremely handy.
Matt Kirsch is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 07:17 PM
  #11  
Reformed Nitroaddict
Member
Thread Starter
 
Reformed Nitroaddict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 443
Default

flying models?
Reformed Nitroaddict is offline  
Old 07-26-2005, 08:22 PM
  #12  
Matt Kirsch
Super Contributor
 
Matt Kirsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,086
Default

Yes, the website Mike Parsons posted earlier:
http://www.flyingmodels.org/motortest/index_e.htm
Matt Kirsch is offline  
Old 08-08-2005, 07:14 PM
  #13  
stanger89
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by Matt Kirsch
The hard part is coming up with a gearbox/prop combination that gets the power to the prop, and this is where flyingmodels comes in extremely handy.
This is also where programs like motocalc come in handy. You can try different props and prop/gear combinations and see how they compare. Just be careful because these programs can give you combinations that would be imposible in real life.
stanger89 is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:27 AM
  #14  
JWN
Swap Shop Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florence, Texas
Posts: 64
Default

There is one problem with the rule of simply using watts and amps to determine if a motor will provide the desired performance and that is the kV rating. Two motors with different kV's will perform differently with the same prop even if they are running at the same wattage on the same battery. For me personally, this is where I start scratching my head. How can I be sure that XXX motor will do what I want it to in YYY airplane? Glow engines have the same problem because so some degree as very few manufacturers will tell you what rpm their engine will turn a specific prop on a specific fuel, much less the specific port timing, port size and volume or combustion chamber shape. (Not that this would matter much as few people understand how all of these variables interact with each other.) However, there are review we can read and other members in our local clubs we can ask who have most likely seen a particular engine in action. I have a feeling that until e-flight becomes as mainstream as wet power, we're going to have to ask lots of questions of those who have already done what we want to do, or experiment on our own a bit using tools such as motorcalc to help us at least head down the right path to our desired destination.

I foresee having a fairly large collection of power components by the time I'm as familiar with them as I am a good old fashioned glow plug engine.
John
JWN is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 04:12 PM
  #15  
stanger89
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by JWN
There is one problem with the rule of simply using watts and amps to determine if a motor will provide the desired performance and that is the kV rating.
But you use watts, and from that amps and volts to pick a motor, or more accurately, to filter your choices. Watts is what flies the plane, so that's what you start. Watts to electrics are like displacement to "gas" airplanes. Say you have a gas plane that's designed for a .46 (eg my Somethin' Extra). They say .46 because it requires a power system of that "class" to fly. There are of course options, you could put a hot .46, or a cheap .40 the performance will be different.

Converting that to electric, you need something like 500W to fly it. Though I'd build it hot (eg a hot .46) so I'm aiming for more like 700W. You could look at it this way, a .46 will put out something like .7 HP. 1hp = 746W, so that comes out to be about 500W to fly the plane.

Two motors with different kV's will perform differently with the same prop even if they are running at the same wattage on the same battery. For me personally, this is where I start scratching my head. How can I be sure that XXX motor will do what I want it to in YYY airplane? Glow engines have the same problem because so some degree as very few manufacturers will tell you what rpm their engine will turn a specific prop on a specific fuel, much less the specific port timing, port size and volume or combustion chamber shape. (Not that this would matter much as few people understand how all of these variables interact with each other.)
This is where reviews, application charts, and simulators come in. Once you've figured out your power requirements, and filtered your motor selection, you look at charts, run them through Motocalc (or similar) to figure out what combo may work best.
stanger89 is offline  
Old 08-10-2005, 09:18 PM
  #16  
JWN
Swap Shop Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Florence, Texas
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by stanger89
But you use watts, and from that amps and volts to pick a motor, or more accurately, to filter your choices. Watts is what flies the plane, so that's what you start. Watts to electrics are like displacement to "gas" airplanes. Say you have a gas plane that's designed for a .46 (eg my Somethin' Extra). They say .46 because it requires a power system of that "class" to fly. There are of course options, you could put a hot .46, or a cheap .40 the performance will be different.
That is exactly correct and is where the problem lies. Watts is generally looked at the same as HP is in an engine. But, just because a .91 ducted fan engine puts out 5+ HP, does not mean it is suitable to fly a 30 lb. P-51. In fact, I'd be surprised if that .91 could even taxi the model around where a gas engine would have no problem yanking it all over the sky. Because of this, you cannot rely on watts alone to determine what motor you should use for a given project. Using the ducted fan example, there are several 1000 watt ducted fan motors running around that couldn't get a small prop driven model off the ground.



This is where reviews, application charts, and simulators come in. Once you've figured out your power requirements, and filtered your motor selection, you look at charts, run them through Motocalc (or similar) to figure out what combo may work best.

That is exactly my point. It's not as easy to pick a power system as it is to pick a glow engine, for the majority of us. This is compounded by the huge selection of motors currently on the market. This selection is not bad, it's quite the opposite. I've looked at the specs for literally hundreds of different motors and am 100% convinced there is a solution available for any type of model and any level of performance desired. Determining what that solution is however, is not always as easy, or inexpensive, as it can be with a glow engine.

Don't take me the wrong way. I'm very interested in learning this new aspect of the hobby (to me), but it is definatly a learning curve and I have far more questions with e-power than I ever did with glow.

John
JWN is offline  
Old 08-18-2005, 10:51 AM
  #17  
rahtware
No more oily right shoes!
 
rahtware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the Left Coast
Posts: 815
Default Confused

Please don’t get me wrong; I’m posting this out of ignorance, not to irritate.

I have read all of this before and it still leaves me with a simple “Why”. Why can’t different motors be compared side by side?

My suggestion is simple. List all of the information needed by a program like MotorCalc so a consumer can make a rational choice. Have you ever tried to wade through the entire pile of BS listed for motors to try to find “Motor Constant, No-load Current and Resistance”?

I still can’t find this information for the Multiplex brushless motors. I sent an E-mail requesting it, but never received a reply… Why?
rahtware is offline  
Old 08-18-2005, 01:28 PM
  #18  
stanger89
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 163
Default

Originally Posted by rahtware
I have read all of this before and it still leaves me with a simple “Why”. Why can’t different motors be compared side by side?


For the simple reason that any motor can "theoretically" put out an infinite amount of power. You could run a Speed 400, on a 4s lipo setup spinning a 12-inch prop and putting out 500-600W of power. It would probably do that, but only for a second before the real world kicked in and it melted. Basically, they can be compared side-by-side, but that comparison can't be simplified to a single number like glow engines.

My suggestion is simple. List all of the information needed by a program like MotorCalc so a consumer can make a rational choice. Have you ever tried to wade through the entire pile of BS listed for motors to try to find “Motor Constant, No-load Current and Resistance”?
Most companies do list all the info needed for MotoCalc, that's exactly what the "pile of BS" is. Motor constant, No-load current, and restistance are what MotoCalc uses to figure performance of the motor.
stanger89 is offline  
Old 08-20-2005, 09:24 PM
  #19  
rahtware
No more oily right shoes!
 
rahtware's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: On the Left Coast
Posts: 815
Default



Most companies do list all the info needed for MotoCalc, that's exactly what the "pile of BS" is. Motor constant, No-load current, and restistance are what MotoCalc uses to figure performance of the motor.


You must have "speed read" the last of my post as I stated the three factors that are needed by MC. And going beyond this, I admit my ignorance when it comes to this subject, but I don't think I have found one company that lists those "exact" factors... As in my statement about Multiplex.

If you can help me wade through "the pile of BS" I would be most grateful.
rahtware is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cybert99
Flight Simulators
51
04-24-2014 11:02 AM
yank51
Humor
5
05-21-2008 12:51 PM
diverdon
Power Systems
5
02-24-2008 08:56 PM
Prof100
RC Radios, Transmitters, Receivers, Servos, gyros
3
01-03-2008 04:06 AM
Airhead
Test Posting Forum
2
02-17-2007 04:22 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


Quick Reply: Comparison Chart anywhere?


Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.14023 seconds with 13 queries