General Electric Discussions Talk about topics related to e-powered RC flying

Your opinions on 1st biplane?

Old 01-04-2013, 10:33 AM
  #1  
yamahafunkplayer
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 36
Question Your opinions on 1st biplane?

I really want a biplane. They just look good, period! What would be a good first time bipe for me to try? Not 3D, but just acro + sport flying. I love the looks of the Ultimate bipe, but it appears that it might be more airplane than I can handle. (preferably balsa, preferably afforadable!)

Here are some that I've been lusting after...

Eflite Ultimate Bipe
Eflite Rhapsody
GP Christen Eagle EP
Dynam Devil
Dynam Wako
any EP version of a Pitts. (my favorite)
yamahafunkplayer is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 12:25 PM
  #2  
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 12,522
Default

As a lover of Bipes ...

WW1 types which a lot want to fly are difficult due to short nose and wheels forward. Ground loops and bad landings !

Later 1930's ... 1950's - are much more friendlier and generally have longer more balanced nose / fuselage.

To have an all round friendly machine ... the crop-sprayer machines would be good ... from UK are the DeHaviland machines such as Tiger and Gypsy Moth ...

Later aerobatic machines such as Pitts ... and it's later cousin the Ultimate are in scale form a handful to fly, but generally the models today such as the Foam Pitts, Ultimates and like my World Models balsa EP Ultimate are actually very good intermediate machines that are quite forgiving ... but also capable of good aerobatics.

So lets consider how good YOU fly ...

Early intermediate - Tiger Moth, Gyspy Moth etc.

Intermediate - Jungmeister, Foamy Pitts, EP Ultimate

Good Intermediate - Scale Pitts, Ultimate, etc.

My thoughts anyway ..

Nigel
solentlife is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 12:38 PM
  #3  
Rodneh
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 753
Default

Tiger Moth, most any brand.
Rodneh is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 03:04 PM
  #4  
rreid7
Member
 
rreid7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North East, MD
Posts: 81
Default

If you are willing to build from a short kit I can highly recommend the Curtiss Jenny from AerodromeRC. It is a pretty straight forward build for a balsa bipe, and also flies very nicely. The design of the kit and the use of precisely laser cut wing struts makes the alignment of the wings a breeze, something that can be tricky with many biplanes.
rreid7 is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 03:57 PM
  #5  
firemanbill
Community Moderator
 
firemanbill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sevierville, Tennessee
Posts: 20,593
Default

A good trainer Bipe would be a Jenny or Tiger Moth.

For a bit more advanced bipe and all around good sport flyer you cn't beat a Waco!
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	wacos015.jpg
Views:	131
Size:	200.3 KB
ID:	165344   Click image for larger version

Name:	2801073668_dcc50fc431_o.jpg
Views:	168
Size:	95.5 KB
ID:	165345   Click image for larger version

Name:	two wacos.jpg
Views:	174
Size:	270.3 KB
ID:	165346  
firemanbill is offline  
Old 01-04-2013, 05:06 PM
  #6  
Stevephoon
Super Contributor
 
Stevephoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 1,140
Default

If you want a kit, try the Mountain Models EVA Bipe. It's a great all around sport bipe that is not too big or too small... About 180 Watts will power it just right!

http://www.mountainmodels.com/produc...roducts_id=214

Here's mine:





Steve
Stevephoon is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 07:29 AM
  #7  
yamahafunkplayer
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 36
Default

everyone, thanks for the great recommendations!

I think I am allergic to CA, every time i use it I get stuffed up and start sneezing and coughing. -so severe I had to go the ER a few weeks ago. So that kinda rules out the kits for me. I guess I am looking for an ARF biplane then.

Anyone else have respiratory issues with CA? I was scratchbuilding a Forerunner from plans and now I am unable to even work on it at all. Just using a tiny drop causes these reactions. Horrible problem to have if you love rc planes...
yamahafunkplayer is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 08:03 AM
  #8  
solentlife
Super Contributor
 
solentlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ex UK Brit now in Latvia west coast - Ventspils
Posts: 12,522
Default

CA is not only glue and in fact is not best contrary to popular belief. There are much better out there, less brittle, environmentally superior etc.
CA is relegated to tacking while more forgiving glues do the main job.
What did we do before CA ?
Nigel
solentlife is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 10:16 AM
  #9  
mclarkson
Super Contributor
 
mclarkson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 3,958
Default

GWS Tiger Moth 400. A wonderful, inexpensive easy-to-fly plane. It was my 3rd plane, my first ARF and my first bipe.

A gentle flier but capable of basic aerobatics. Here's some of the gentle variety, from this afternoon.

mclarkson is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 12:26 PM
  #10  
yamahafunkplayer
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 36
Default tiger moth!

that's what I'm looking for. an easy to fly, but still aerobatic, bipe... awesome... thanks for the video, it's easier to judge how a plane flies when you can see it for yourself!
yamahafunkplayer is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 01:03 PM
  #11  
Stevephoon
Super Contributor
 
Stevephoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
Posts: 1,140
Default

Originally Posted by yamahafunkplayer View Post
....
Anyone else have respiratory issues with CA? I was scratchbuilding a Forerunner from plans and now I am unable to even work on it at all. Just using a tiny drop causes these reactions. Horrible problem to have if you love rc planes...
I have issues with CA as well. Not as bad as yours, but it still bothers me. When I use CA I use the Foam Safe / Odorless versions. Those do not bother me. I still use Titebond a lot as well. Like Nigel said, there are lots of glues available. Don't give up on building, just change glues.

Good Luck with your search and your builds.

Steve
Stevephoon is offline  
Old 01-07-2013, 04:34 PM
  #12  
Rodneh
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 753
Default

There is no need to use CA. You can build just as well if not better using other glues. We got along fine without CA for many generations without it.
Any of the alaphatics will do fine and then there is always epoxy for those joints demanding maximum strength.
Originally Posted by yamahafunkplayer View Post
everyone, thanks for the great recommendations!

I think I am allergic to CA, every time i use it I get stuffed up and start sneezing and coughing. -so severe I had to go the ER a few weeks ago. So that kinda rules out the kits for me. I guess I am looking for an ARF biplane then.

Anyone else have respiratory issues with CA? I was scratchbuilding a Forerunner from plans and now I am unable to even work on it at all. Just using a tiny drop causes these reactions. Horrible problem to have if you love rc planes...
Rodneh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bald Paul
Scratch and Kit Built Aircraft
48
04-16-2013 09:01 PM
jodini
Events, Shows and Fun Fly's - Electric Airplanes
0
12-07-2012 01:55 PM
Trento
Beginners
9
10-18-2011 01:11 AM
crashnburn
Sport Planes (Formerly I/C & Gas Conversion)
7
04-24-2011 02:43 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Quick Reply: Your opinions on 1st biplane?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.

Page generated in 0.12272 seconds with 17 queries